Helmet laws: Victoria

Introduction and scope

The Victoria helmet law came into effect from July 1990. It applies to all ages.

The penalty for adults not wearing a 'securely fitted approved bicycle helmet', is usually a Bicycle Offence Penalty Notice, which is a fine. Children receive a Bicycle Offence Report, which is a letter to their parents, without monetary penalty.

Compliance and enforcement

Introduction of the law resulted in a rise in cycle helmet use from 31% to 75% of cyclists.

The Victoria law is strictly enforced. In its first year 19,229 Bicycle Offence Penalty Notices and 5,028 Bicycle Offence Reports were issued. This represented 2.6% of all traffic offence notices, proportionally higher per kilometre than all other traffic offence notices together (King and Fraine, 1993). Even in the law's third year of operation, 86% of all traffic offences by cyclists were instancs of not wearing a helmet (AustCyclist, 1993).

In 2003 Victoria Police said that they still issue around 20,000 Bicycle Offence Penalty Notices a year. On 8th May 1996, Kathy Francis was imprisoned for 24 hours for not paying fines for not wearing a helmet. She was 40 years of age and 6 months pregnant at the time.

Effect on casualties

Admissions in the first four years of helmet legislation were 40% below the number expected on the basis of pre-legislation trends. However, there was no difference in the percentage with head injury, compared to what would have been expected without the law (Carr, Dyte and Cameron, 1995). In the first two years of the law % head injury for cyclists fell by only 1.7 percentage points, whereas % head injury for pedestrians (without helmets) fell by 2.5 percentage points. The gains in pedestrian safety have been attributed to general road safety initiatives which would also have benefited cyclists. It is therefore not possible to attribute any reduction in head injuries to the helmet law.

In Melbourne the number of cyclists sustaining severe injuries other than to the head was 4% and 12% lower in the first two post-law years compared with pre-law (Cameron, Newstead, Vulcan and Finch, 1994). These reductions are much less than the reduction in the number of cyclists and suggests that overall safety was reduced.

Effect on cycle use

Bicycle use by children aged 5-17 decreased by 36% from May/June 1990 to May/June 1991 (Cameron, Heiman and Neiger, 1992). There were further falls to May/June 1992 in Melbourne, with teenage cycling showing by then a 46% decrease from pre-law levels (Finch, Heiman and Neiger, 1993).

3.4% of trips in Melbourne were by bicycle in 1985-6. The latest data available in 2004 shows that this is now 2.0%. (ABC, 2004)

Cost benefit

Data published before introducing the helmet law indicated that there would be a benefit. However, it did not consider cycling being discouraged or other effects. There has been no post-law cost-benefit analysis.

The references below include additional related studies

References

ABC, 2004

Australia bicycle ownership and use. Australian Bicycle Council, 2004.

AustCyclist, 1993

Vic Police target unhelmeted cyclists. Australian Cyclist, December 1993 p.17.

Cameron, Finch and Vulcan, 1994

Cameron M, Finch C, Vulcan P, 1994. The Protective Performance of Bicycle Helmets introduced at the same time as the Bicycle Helmet Wearing Law in Victoria. Monash University Accident Research Centre Report 59.

Cameron, Heiman and Neiger, 1992

Cameron M, Heiman L, Neiger D, 1992. Evaluation of the Bicycle Helmet Wearing Law in Victoria During its First 12 Months. Monash University Accident Research Centre Report 32.

Cameron, Newstead, Vulcan and Finch, 1994

Cameron M, Newstead S, Vulcan P, Finch C, 1994. Effects of the compulsory bicycle helmet wearing law in Victoria during its first three years. Monash University Accident Research Centre .

Cameron, Vulcan, Finch and Newstead, 1994

Cameron MH, Vulcan AP, Finch CF, Newstead SV, 1994. Mandatory bicycle helmet use following a decade of helmet promotion in Victoria, Australia - an evaluation. Accident Analysis & Prevention 1994;26(3):325-337.

Carr, Dyte and Cameron, 1995

Carr D, Dyte D, Cameron MH, 1995. Evaluation of the bicycle helmet wearing law in Victoria during its first four years. Monash University Accident Research Centre Report 76.

Finch, Heiman and Neiger, 1993

Finch C, Heiman L, Neiger D, 1993. Bicycle Use and Helmet Wearing Rates in Melbourne, 1987 to 1992: the influence of the helmet wearing law. Monash University Accident Research Centre Report 45.

Finch, Newstead, Cameron and Vulcan, 1993b

Finch CF, Newstead SV, Cameron MH, Vulcan AP, 1993. Head injury reductions in Victoria two years after introduction of mandatory bicycle helmet use. Monash University Accident Research Centre Report 51.

King and Fraine, 1993

King M, Fraine G, 1993. Bicycle helmet legislation and enforcement in Queensland 1991-3: effects on helmet wearing and crashes. Queensland Transport, Brisbane June 1993.

Morgan, Peberdy and Rogerson

Morgan M, Peberdy J, Rogerson P, 1991. Bicycle helmet usage rates in Victoria, 1990 - 1991. Vic Roads GR91-9 ISBN 073061381X.

Newstead, Cameron, Gantzer and Finch, 1994

Newstead SV, Cameron MH, Gantzer S, Finch CF, 1994. Bicyclist Head Injuries in Victoria Three Years after the Introduction of Mandatory Helmet Use. Monash University Accident Research Centre Report 75.

Vulcan, Cameron and Heiman, 1993

Vulcan AP, Cameron MH, Heiman L, 1993. Mandatory bicycle helmet use - Victoria, Australia. Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report 1993;42(18):359-363.

Vulcan, Cameron and Watson, 1992

Vulcan AP, Cameron MH, Watson WL, 1992. Mandatory bicycle helmet use: experience in Victoria, Australia. World Journal of Surgery 1992;16:389-397.

Related News