Child Helmet Laws: Summary
Child helmet laws
- are disproportionate to the risk of head injury when cycling.
- reduce cycling much more than they increase helmet use.
- threaten the lives and well-being of thousands of children by discouraging
a healthy activity.
- aggravate efforts to encourage more people to lead active lifestyles.
- represent poor value for money. The laws in Australia and New Zealand
failed subsequent cost-benefit analyses [1] [2].
References
[1] Taylor M, Scuffham P. New Zealand bicycle helmet law - do the costs
outweigh the benefits? Injury Prevention,
2002;8:317-320
[2] Hendre et al. An Economic Evaluation of the Mandatory Bicycle
Helmet Legislation in Western Australia. Australia Road
Accident Prevention Research Unit, 1999. 