cyclehelmets.org

Litigation

UK

There is no legal obligation for cyclists to wear helmets in the UK, but it has become common for insurance companies to claim contributory negligence in cases where unhelmeted cyclists have suffered head injury. So far as is known, no counter-claim of negligence for not wearing a helmet has yet been upheld by a UK court, yet many cyclists accept reduced damages voluntarily for fear of proceeding to trial.

Medical opinion in litigation

The views of a solicitor and a neurosurgeon on the effectiveness of helmets.

A solicitor's experience

The views of another solicitor specialising in cycling injuries.

Helmet standards and capabilities

The view of the UK's foremost expert on helmet mechanics including his experiences in court.

Liverpool cyclist wins helmet litigation

A cyclist in Liverpool wins full damages despite a counter-claim that he was negligent by not wearing a cycle helmet. 1999.

 

Young cyclist wins crash case against insurance 'bully-boys'

Judge rules that unhelmeted child was not negligent. 2001.

Newcastle High Court judgement against contributory negligence

High Court judge rules that child cyclist was not negligent for not wearing a helmet, although the child lost the case on other grounds. 2001

Cyclists win helmet battle with insurer

Insurance company drops claim of contributory negligence after protest by CTC. 2002


Main Topics

www.cyclehelmets.org

Search site  

Published by the Bicycle Helmet Research Foundation, which exists to undertake, encourage and spread the scientific study of bicycle helmets and to provide access to a wide range of information to assist the understanding of this complex subject.
Most information published on www.cyclehelmets.org has been subjected to multi-disciplinary peer review.
Material is copyright BHRF, but may be reproduced provided this is done in full, without modification, and the source is acknowledged.